What is a hate speech who make it up

What is a hate speech who make It up and who abuses It in Slovenia?

What are the Millennium Evolution for one or two ‘ smart ‘ generations of Slovenian intellectuals and descendants of excellence? With the paradigm on the media party and in the company of runaway officers, you become yourself. 

And it was a hostile speech. 

The #Sskj is the word #hostility of a long snake on paper

Sovrážnost-I Ž (ā) 1. Hostile attitude, hostile emotion: show hostility in words and actions; Hostility towards a stranger/unusual hostility to life 2.mn., publ. Military operations, armed conflicts: to stop, start hostility; Agreement on the cessation of hostility between countries/eruption of hostility sudden change of disguised opposition to the honest clash (more on hostility).

Hate speech is a stranger, if it even exists?

This is the new inventionwho is the dictionary of the Slovenian Book language ( #Sskj) not known. It is so new that we are looking for it in the dictionary of the newer vocabulary of the Slovene language. The result is equal to the previous: “No hits for hate speech”. Hate speech does not mention either the Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia and it is literally not mentioned either in the Penal Code of the Republic of Slovenia (KZ-1-NPB4).

Hate speech is round and there’s nothing inside.

However, hate speech is mentioned and superficial only on the website of the online eye (s). This web organism has planted a doubtin me. They are rare, which they have managed to prove on the web that data collection is meaningful only if the problem solving is affected then you are tackling the door-to-doorpractice, and the collected donations are used to further develop hostile evolution and round table, where donors convince you that you are one and only fighter.

And who is going to do the right rhetonical crimes, who gives the charges and criminal prosecutions against the people?

According to Defolt, members, agents and guardians of anything are exempted from the notion of hostility. Their conception, even if they are listed with the fascist, are of a medical significance. They are alpha and Omega in the assessment, their interpreting are biblical proportions, are inseparable and immune to yet so deadly nationalistic-racist viruses. None of their statement, to be even so unfair, offensive, can not be defined as such. Each member enjoys full immunity and more.

The biggest archived landfill of a rhetor pig is rotting, it stinks, and no one wants to get near her.

What if or if it’s true

  1. Hate speech by The owner’s assault in Dražgoshah,
  2. Hate speech cynical-despictive Turkish statement, former president of second class,
  3. Hate speech the court summons the courts in which they threaten to bring forced
  4. Hate speech Tvitanje Program Councilor #RTV Slovenije (Bonus of verbal violence)
  5. Hate speech manipulative-misleading fake novičarstvo daily informative broadcasts of dominating media,
  6. A tendency to socialistic advocacy of their own privileges,
  7. Hate speech by the????

Tens of thousands have witnessed that folk regularly points to the spread of the vulsalus. In the most brutal cases, of course, something moves. The most disgusting offenders reward with a function on which they can further spread their exodation, some of the richer they subsidize.

According to the definition of the online eye, hate speech is the expression of opinions and ideas which, by their very nature, are discriminatory (xenophobic, racist, homophobic and similar) and directed against various minorities (ethnic, ethnic, religious, cultural, sexual and Similar). The hate speech is therefore based on the belief that some people are inferior because they belong to a particular group due to individual personal circumstances.

These personal circumstances may be:

  • Nationality
  • Race or ethnic origin,
  • Religious or other beliefs,
  • Sex
  • Health status,
  • Language
  • Sexual orientation,
  • Disability
  • Age
  • Ghazic State,
  • Education
  • Social status and other

Most of them see in the cases mentioned above.

The above quoted definition of hate speech is of course limited, adjusted, parated. The popular analyzer argues the reverse that the definition of hate speech of the online eye is pure hate speech against the majority population. And as a colleague of Zirosi says, “most of those who speak of him most are living with heads deep in their own asses.”

Here’s proof that sarcasm is the best definition of hate speech.

What about the Slovenians from all the winds say about the hate speech?

Andreja: “Hate speech is everything that a leftist hears when he speaks a right hand.”

Matija Jeglič: “Any objection and criticism of lies, irresponsible, injurious behaviour has been recognised nowadays by” hate speech. “

Reflex: “Clever Slovenians invented hate speech to defend themselves against honest attackers?”

Martin Valič: “Hate speech is the one who deprives the right of others to express his opinion, even if it is stupid, crappy or defective.”

Winston: “Hate speech is advocating national and racial interest and referencing the facts.”

Every day more and more with every run, there seems to be no hate speech at all. It’s just a roar, mourning, hostility, contempt… Hate speech remains a metaphor and an excuse for the incapacitated, rhetor, the lack of intelligence and is the nedoraslost of the Guardians. Someone is heartening to the fantastical specific traditional concepts, in order to conceal his own intolerance in the famous phrase, to freely spread his own hostile rhetoric and contempt. The jerk is still a jerk, the faggot is still a fag and the donkey is still a donkey. They hate and love just as much today as they loved and hated centuries ago. This fact, and the truth, is just not to be avoided by any artificial phrase, with no institution. In fact, it is inhumane that a society that does not raise a bad raise, conceives the shields that would conceal the reality and not least at the expense of the untruths served.

And if the hate speech would really be a credible notion, the keeper would be a friendly pleasure to play his premiere role in the very chosen players.

Any resemblance to the aforementioned is merely incidental to evidence.

translated by google translate

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.